[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: utime()

To: boender@dutiws.TWI.TUDelft.NL (Hildo Biersma)
Subject: Re: utime()
From: Julian F. Reschke <julian@GINA.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 93 13:51:39 MET DST
Cc: mint@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu (MiNT-Liste)
In-reply-to: <9301271247.AA02122@dutiws.twi.tudelft.nl>; from "Hildo Biersma" at Jan 27, 93 1:47 pm
Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet, Muenster, Germany Department of Mathematics

> 
> Hi Julian,
> I agree such a function should be added.
> Maybe it should be a system call, though.

That would be nicer, yes. But I don't think that this is the best moment
to make changes in the kernel and in the interface between file system
drivers and the kernel... (look at the version number :-).

> Another wish of mine: a Ftruncate() call.
> Also possible as an Fcntl() command, of course.
> 

Indeed. Let's define yet another standard opcode for Fcntl!


-- 
________________ cut here _________________________
Julian F. Reschke, Hensenstr. 142, D-W4400 Muenster
  eMail: julian@math.uni-muenster.de, jr@ms.maus.de
________ correct me if I'm wrong __________________

Follow-Ups:
- Re: utime()
  - From: Stephen Usher <steve@earth.ox.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: utime()
Next by Date: Re: utime()
Previous by thread: utime()
Next by thread: Re: utime()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread