[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MiNT security ?
> Here's a list of functions that immediately spring to mind which
> should require root privs to use:
>
> Super(),Rwabs(),Setexc(),Floprd(),Flopwr(),Flopfmt(),Mfpint(),Xbitimer(),
> Supexec().
Problem is, that there are a lot of things that are important for
applications and which can only done in Supervisor mode -- accessing
the cookie jar comes to mind immediately (how about a new system call
for that, Eric?).
Sorry, but I don't see a secure MiNT in the next time. Performance
optimizations, virtual memory, async. device drivers and so on should
have higher priority.
--
________________ cut here _________________________
Julian F. Reschke, Hensenstr. 142, D-W4400 Muenster
eMail: julian@math.uni-muenster.de, jr@ms.maus.de
________ correct me if I'm wrong __________________
- References:
- MiNT security ?
- From: Stephen Henson (CSM) <shenson@camborne-school-of-mines.ac.uk>