[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in GCC 2.4.5 PL 1 with MiNTLibs PL 30

To: Stephen Usher <steve@earth.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug in GCC 2.4.5 PL 1 with MiNTLibs PL 30
From: Bjarne Pohlers <bjarne@GOEDEL.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 15:14:52 +0200
Cc: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu (mint)
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 15 Jul 93 13:06:44 +0100. <9967.9307151206@earth.ox.ac.uk>
Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet, Muenster, Germany Department of Mathematics
Sender: bjarne@GOEDEL.UNI-MUENSTER.DE

|>GCC 2.4.* is well known to be VERY buggy at the moment, I'm waiting until
|>the number of bugs per day reported on gnu.gcc.bug goes below 10!

|>Currently, the new m68k code generator code is terminally broken, if I were
|>you I'd go back down to 2.3.3.

No, I think that is a problem of the optimizer and the inline-binding
of Super(). I had a similar problem with an older version of GCC, and
a Super()-call. I solved it in using Supexec().

References:
- Re: Bug in GCC 2.4.5 PL 1 with MiNTLibs PL 30
  - From: Stephen Usher <steve@earth.ox.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug in GCC 2.4.5 PL 1 with MiNTLibs PL 30
Next by Date: Re: termios, /dev/aux
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in GCC 2.4.5 PL 1 with MiNTLibs PL 30
Next by thread: Re: Bug in GCC 2.4.5 PL 1 with MiNTLibs PL 30
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread