[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: another 1.10 job control bug?

To: entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu (Nicholas S Castellano)
Subject: Re: another 1.10 job control bug?
From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 94 19:01:20 CET
Cc: itschere@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE, mint@atari.archive.umich.edu
In-reply-to: <199403072339.SAA16305@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>; from "Nicholas S Castellano" at Mar 7, 94 6:39 pm

Nicholas S Castellano writes:

> Replacing the loop with:
> 
> 			for (p = proclist; p; p = p->gl_next) {
> 				if (p->pgrp == pgrp && p->handle[-1] == fp
> 				    && p != curproc)
> 					found++;
> 			}
> 
> ...seems to do the right thing more often.

 oops :)  thanx...
	Juergen
-- 
J"urgen Lock / nox@jelal.north.de / UUCP: ..!uunet!unido!uniol!jelal!nox
								...ohne Gewehr
PGP public key fingerprint =  8A 18 58 54 03 7B FC 12  1F 8B 63 C7 19 27 CF DA

References:
- another 1.10 job control bug?
  - From: "Nicholas S Castellano" <entropy@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Minixfs Multitos crash ...
Next by Date: Re: load average patches for MiNT 1.10 + patches
Previous by thread: another 1.10 job control bug?
Next by thread: Re: another 1.10 job control bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread