Re: MiNT 1.10 re-sync

[Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>]

Howard Chu writes:

> As for ground rules - it seems to me that patches that are posted, which get no
> follow-up comment, are accepted by everyone. Patches that appear to have
> problems generally cause further discussion, followup patches, etc. Can we
> assume that any patch that has been posted, that hasn't generated further
> discussion, should be integrated into the "master tree" ?

 sounds useful.  athough i'm still testing a followup patch (bigger one)
to your sticky text one, to reduce fragmentation etc...  and i'd like to
use the sticky bit for it if you don't mind. :)

 cheers
	Juergen
-- 
J"urgen Lock / nox@jelal.north.de / UUCP: ..!uunet!unido!uniol!jelal!nox
								...ohne Gewehr
PGP public key fingerprint =  8A 18 58 54 03 7B FC 12  1F 8B 63 C7 19 27 CF DA