Re: Talarm() problem

[Andreas Schwab <schwab@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>]

Dominik.Strasser@mch.sni.de writes:

|> Hi Thorsten,
|> I think this behaviour is correct as the signal handler isn't active any more
|> after the signal has occurred.
|> If you re-register your signal-handler immediately after the signal (in the 
|> handler) everything works fine.
|> btw. I have the same behaviour here on a SVR4 system. (SINIX)

No, MiNT doesn't have the braindead SYSV signals. It has BSD signals,
which don't get zapped when the signal has occured.

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Andreas Schwab                                      "And now for something
schwab@ls5.informatik.uni-dortmund.de                completely different"