[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pty question

To: huveneer@math.ruu.nl (Richard Huveneers)
Subject: Re: pty question
From: Kay Roemer <roemer@informatik.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 1994 10:14:05 +0200 (MESZ)
Cc: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu
In-reply-to: <199408020743.AA15997@hieper.math.ruu.nl> from "Richard Huveneers" at Aug 2, 94 09:43:13 am
Posted-date: Mon, 8 Aug 1994 10:14:05 +0200 (MESZ)

> I noticed some strange behaviour of Mint regarding to pty's:
> 
> If the masterfd is closed, the process having opened the slavefd does not
> terminate, but takes about all CPU cycles it can, slowing down my Atari
> considerably.
> Shouldn't it be that Mint sends SIGHUP or SIGTERM to the process(es) having
> opened the slavefd when the masterfd is closed?

I have a similar problem with term but vice versa. The slave is closed and
the process which hab the pty as its controlling terminal exits. But the
master is not closed, because the term server gets no EOF on the master.

Kay.

References:
- pty question
  - From: Richard Huveneers <huveneer@math.ruu.nl>

Prev by Date: MiNTOS Release 1.4 now available.
Next by Date: Re: MiNTOS Release 1.4 now available.
Previous by thread: pty question
Next by thread: Talarm() problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread