[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in Gcc 2.5.8

To: Mint list <mint@atari.archive.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Bug in Gcc 2.5.8
From: "C.P.Briscoe-Smith" <cpbs@ukc.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 1994 18:00:16 +0000
Cc: cpbs@ukc.ac.uk
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Nov 1994 08:29:57 +0100." <Pine.HPP.3.90.941122082401.20017A-100000@hands.ped.gu.se>

Re: does the ADDQ #x,An instruction affect the status register?

I've seen some people's results posted here, but they all seem to be
using 680x0's where x>2.  I tried it with my x=0.

I just tried executing  ADDQ.W #4,A7  using Debug+.  I executed it with
the SR set to 0x0300 and to 0x031F.  In both cases the ADDQ instruction
did _not_ affect the SR's value.

I'm using an STe with a plain ol' 68000 in.

Hope this additional evidence helps.

--
Charles Briscoe-Smith
3rd Year student of Computer Science
University of Kent at Canterbury, United Kingdom, European Union.
World Wide Web:  http://aurora.etsiig.uniovi.es:3080/~~pippin/

References:
- Re: Bug in Gcc 2.5.8
  - From: Stefan Berndtsson <pedstef@ped.gu.se>

Prev by Date: Re: MiNT-Library: Bugs
Next by Date: Re: meeting the license
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in Gcc 2.5.8
Next by thread: Re: Bug in Gcc 2.5.8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread