[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc-ld woes
Scott Bigham writes:
> Is there a version of gcc-ld more recent than the one in mgutil36.zoo on
> a.a? That one's ca. May `93, and after fighting it for a while, I'm
> about ready to drop-kick it across the room. Specifically:
>
> - The -lfred option only looks for fred.olb, and won't pick up
> libfred.a.
well pl38 still does that.
but ln(1) is your friend...
> - It apparently doesn't scan libraries multiple times, leading to
> scads of undefined symbols unless I explicitly put every library on
> the command line twice.
if your lib makefile looks for ranlib:
#! /bin/sh
exec /where/ever/yours/is/gcc-ar s $@
otherwise add the s to the ar commands as someone else already said.
>
> Surely this has been fixed since then.
>
> -sbigham
cheers
Juergen
- References:
- gcc-ld woes
- From: dsb@goldfinch.cs.duke.edu (Scott Bigham)