[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MiNT040
> > I.e. MiNT doesn't work on 040? It is strange, because I remember I saw a
> > portion of 040 code in the MiNT source files (don't remember exactly
> > where, but it was of course one of *.spp files).
>
> MiNT compiled for 000 does work on 040. I just compiled MiNT sources with
> GCC optimizations for 040. So the kernel is/should be faster on 040,
> nothing more. Unfortunately my knowledges don't allow me to patch kernel
> for real support of 68040 (especially I miss the memory protection..)
Don't worry, memory protection does not work very well on 030 too... at
least on my machine... I even started thinking on if my Falcon has not a
damaged PMMU, but I hear others have similar troubles too (on most Falcon
i saw running mint the memprot is turned off).
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MiNT040
- From: "James Cox" <jamesco@cogs.susx.ac.uk>
- References:
- Re: MiNT040
- From: Petr Stehlik <stehlik@cas3.zlin.vutbr.cz>