Re: Cookie jar patch for Supexec/Super patch?

[Stephan Gross <1gross@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>]

> >>>>> Sven Karlsson <sven@it.lth.se> had an idea a few days ago:
> > And add a flag in the prg header to control super/supexec behaivour.
> 
> Instead of setting it in the prg-header, we can also set it somewhere
> else, e.g. at a defined location in the text or data section of the
> program, guarded by some magic value to avoid misinterpretation of old
> programs.

>   Hartmut

I propose setting a new global symbol called 'secure_mint' or 
something in the same way as 'stksize' war used before.

    Stephan Gross
    1gross@informatik.uni-hamburg.de