[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GEM and memory protection

To: Julian Reschke-FJR010 <Julian_Reschke-FJR010@email.mot.com>
Subject: Re: GEM and memory protection
From: Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 12:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: "mint@atari.archive.umich.edu" <mint@atari.archive.umich.edu>
In-reply-to: <3566E6BC.797C0679@email.mot.com>

> If other programs fail to do it properly, why not set the program flags
> just for them, instead of disabling MP for all GEM programs?

Because you never know if a program handles AV protocol properly before
you experience a crash.

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
|mail: draco@mi.com.pl                  | Atari Falcon030/TT030/65XE |
|http://www.orient.uw.edu.pl/~conradus/ | ** FreeMiNT development ** |

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** U pospolstwa normalne jest, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.

References:
- Re: GEM and memory protection
  - From: Julian Reschke-FJR010 <Julian_Reschke-FJR010@email.mot.com>

Prev by Date: Virtual Memory (Was Re: Kernel 1.14.7 available)
Next by Date: Memory protection (AES 4.1 bug)
Previous by thread: Re: GEM and memory protection
Next by thread: Re: GEM and memory protection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread