Re: GEM and memory protection

[Konrad Kokoszkiewicz <draco@mi.com.pl>]

> > The better solution would be to protect the shell against being killed 
> > because of a faulty AV-client. If that is possible to do, I am all for
> > such a solution. If not - well,... socialism died due to preferring nice
> > theory over the reality.
> 
> I'll admit to not having followed the discussion closely, but wouldn't
> a signal handler for SIGSEG do the trick?

Yes, perhaps. Desktop developers should try that. 

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
|mail: draco@mi.com.pl                  | Atari Falcon030/TT030/65XE |
|http://www.orient.uw.edu.pl/~conradus/ | ** FreeMiNT development ** |

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** U pospolstwa normalne jest, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.