[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: KGMD 2.0
>Can you send me the log from your installation script/program so I can
>see how that compares with my list.
If you actually read the whole thread, you'll notice I don't have any
installation process yet. In fact, one of my posts actually asked if
there is some generic GEM installer that can follow scripts.
>I assume yours follows the different partitions for /home, /usr & /var.
>What sort of partition sizes have you adopted, what's your reasoning and
>how have you mounted them?
At this point, I suggest we continue the rest of this discussion
through private mail, as we're about to compare our packages.
>On Mon, 25 May 1998, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:
>
>> >Thanks to Eero et al for pointing out the FHS documentation.
>> >
>> >I'm going to start converting KGMD 1.0 to 2.0 very soon.
>> >
>> >IF ANYONE ELSE IS DOING THIS, PLEASE MAIL ME, AS I _HATE_
>> >DUPLICATING WORK AND MAYBE WE CAN HELP EACH OTHER...
>>
>> As I previously mentioned, I already have a basic ST kit.
>> I'm only waiting for the official 1.15 version to complete my
>> docs and release it.
>>
>> For the All Inclusive Super MiNT Kit, with all the GNU ports
>> one could dream of, I haven't started yet. However, my basic
>> kit follows FHS structure, so adding the advanced Unix stuff
>> and making a 030 (or 040/060) version shouldn't be hard.
>>
>> We could collaborate on this, if you like.
>>
>> When I have my basic ST kit ready, I can send it to you for
>> adding the advanced GNU stuff, NFS and whatever else (others
>> can get involved for the more advanced Unix stuff too).
>>
>> How does that sound?
>>