Re: oAESis

[Anthony Jacques <jacquesa@zetnet.co.uk>]

Hiya

Jan Paul Schmidt <Jan.P.Schmidt@mni.fh-giessen.de> wrote these words: 
> To let you all know, there was oAESis 0.80, which Christer send me a long
> time ago when I was doing some fixes for it. 

Ah.... so where can we find this version? (it wasn't on the oAESis WWW-page
when I checked last night).

> the source, which is really needed for oAESis. I also run into deep
> trouble when compiling with gcc. I was not able to run the gcc executable
> under memory protection and had sometimes strange effect like oAESis
> overwriting its own code. The Pure C executable always run fine.

I dont have PureC.... but then, memory protection doesn't work with
my FX-ram enabled anyway, so...

> For me, oAESis was closer to N.AES than XaAES.

I agree. Whether its closer to the ideal AES, on the other hand, is
not so clear.

> By the way, a friend of mine stand with his mouth open, when I played a
> mov file and moved the mouse to the menu, it dropped down and the movie
> was still playing. Has someone seen such a multitasking feature with
> MagiC or N.AES :o)

Yes, I agree that this is a very nice feature...

Anthony
-- 
----------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Anthony Jacques           IRC: AnthonyJ | Bad Mood, GEM-DEU, FracTalk,
                          ICQ: 11287923 | STOS patching, Falcon Extn,
jacquesa@zetnet.co.uk                   | MiNT.CNF, Reschange, Tuna,
http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/jacquesa/ | and more... which shall I do?
----------------------------------------+-------------------------------