Super and Supexec in the latest beta

["Julian F. Reschke" <fjr010@email.mot.com>]

Hi,

I have again run my test program (attached).

When using Supexec, it returns -36L (EACCDN) and does not run the
supervisor code. I'm not sure that this is a good idea, because the
routine that was supposed to run could possibly return the same value.

I think it would be a much better idea just to run the code in user
mode and let it generate a signal when accessing something it shouldn't.

I think *that* was the expected behaviour for Super(), however the
code is run in supervisor mode. At least the sample code returns
the SYSHEADER pointer although it was running on a pid != 0. Check
suptest.ttp with parameter "super".

Regards, jr