RE: New file system IDs and others.

[Katherine L Ellis <kellis@primenet.com>]

On Sat, 27 Jun 1998, Howard Chu wrote:

>"The Unix shared lib implementation" isn't terribly interesting for a number
>of reasons:
>	it requires a PMMU, and my scheme doesn't
>	68K unix is almost nonexistent these days anyway
>	Besides Sun, almost nobody implemented the SVR4 68K ABI standard
>	   and Sun didn't really correctly implement the spec either
>However, while it's not interesting to use it directly, it's instructive to
>understand how the 68K Unix implementation worked, or was meant to work in
>its spec.
Ok, makes sense howard, as usual. Thanks for making it clear. 
Does linux 68k have shared lib? if yes, the question is, would GEM
cope with that kind? if yes or no, Well do we have to always keep in
mind ST users? If yes, still keeping ST user, wouldn't be possible to
propose versions? WITH shared lib/without? 
(just curious to know all that, scuse me for my ignorance, I know it
bugs the hell out of knowledgable people).
thanks
________________________________________________________________________________
Email:Kellis@primenet.com
Web http://www.primenet.com/~kellis/
________________________________________________________________________________