[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: [MiNT] drive letters

To: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.com>, t150315@students.cc.tut.fi
Subject: Re: AW: [MiNT] drive letters
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 22:15:24 +0100
Cc: mint@fishpool.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990205094215.16486G-100000@hal.fishpool.com>; from Martin-Eric Racine on Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 09:43:35AM +0200
References: <19990204204614.27263.qmail@assari.cc.tut.fi> <Pine.LNX.3.96.990205094215.16486G-100000@hal.fishpool.com>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Fri, Feb 05, 1999 at 09:43:35AM +0200, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:
> Actually, we did.... GCC 2.7.x wants lib*.olb but 2.5.3
> (the one in KGMD?) and 2.8.x want *.a

No, we did not. Just renaming the static libraries is just a minor
inconvenience compared to upgrading a system to a completely new binary
format, and to a completely new set of shared libraries.

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AW: [MiNT] drive letters
  - From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.com>

References:
- Re: AW: [MiNT] drive letters
  - From: t150315@students.cc.tut.fi
- Re: AW: [MiNT] drive letters
  - From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] old KGMD or new NMD?
Next by Date: RE: AW: [MiNT] drive letters
Previous by thread: AW: [MiNT] drive letters
Next by thread: Re: AW: [MiNT] drive letters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread