Re: [MiNT] Memory protection

[michael@fastlane.net (Michael White)]

>Hi!
>
>> >Wouldn't it be possible to combine #2 & #3?
>> 
>> Actually, #3 should already be that way.  The problem is that a number
>> of the new protocols (e.g. OLGA) don't work well under memory protection
>> (so I hear, anyway).  Hence was born #2, which is less powerful than #3
>> but more flexible.
>
>This is a problem of the application. If they use the right Mxalloc() 
>mode there is no problem (also if private virtual address rooms are 
>implemented).

You are absolutely correct.


Michael White (michael@fastlane.net)