Re: [MiNT] MiNTlibs question

[Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>]

On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 03:02:48PM +0200, Thomas Binder wrote:
> I would opt to, though I'm not familar with the internals, either. But I
> can't imagine there are negative side effects if there's already a
> possibility to change it. Also, losing half of the available block for
> each call to Malloc() with active memory protection seems to be a much
> more negative "side effect" of the default 4k.

Right.

Is it possible to qrery the pagesize that the kernel currently uses, and use
that as a blocksize for malloc()?

That way, no changes to Mintlib would be required when changing the kernel
for some reason.

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen