[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW: [MiNT] analysing syscall.spp

To: Julian Reschke <reschke@muenster.de>
Subject: Re: AW: [MiNT] analysing syscall.spp
From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:27:48 +0200 (MESZ)
Cc: Jörg Westheide <Joerg_Westheide@su.maus.de>, mint@fishpool.com
In-reply-to: <000601be89a1$c7460f70$cf00a8c0@nbreschke>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Hi Julian!

> > Especially for the file system calls it should be very difficult or
> > impossible (and not worth the work)
> 
> Then you won't be able to make use of background DMA.

No, you are wrong. There is a big difference between 'callable from 
interrupts' and 'non blocking filesystem operations'.


Tschuess
   ...Frank

--
ATARI FALCON 040
--------------------------------------
Internet: fnaumann@cs.uni-magdeburg.de
Mausnet:  Frank Naumann @ L2

References:
- AW: [MiNT] analysing syscall.spp
  - From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] 030-only binaries
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Problem with VFAT ?
Previous by thread: RE: AW: [MiNT] analysing syscall.spp
Next by thread: [MiNT] ext2 0.4.6 and e2fs tools
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread