[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] ext2fs

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] ext2fs
From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 04:23:45 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9905041552020.12584-100000@proxy.sophics>; from Petr Stehlik on Tue, May 04, 1999 at 04:22:53PM +0200
Mail-followup-to: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990504162832.12800A-100000@hal.fishpool.fi> <Pine.LNX.4.05.9905041552020.12584-100000@proxy.sophics>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 04:22:53PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Well, some of the objections were reasonable: the cookies provide pointers
> to two short int variables in kernel that keep current time and date.
> When/if those two short int variables are removed the cookies can't work.
> Guido (or someone else) said those variables would be removed soon. I
> don't know why the variables should be removed, though.

In fact I said the contrary, i. e. that it will take a long time to get
rid of them.  That was pure blasphemy as I learned today ... ;-)

Ciao

Guido
-- 
http://stud.uni-sb.de/~gufl0000
mailto:gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de

References:
- Re: [MiNT] ext2fs
  - From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.com>
- Re: [MiNT] ext2fs
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.zln.cz>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.51
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] WDIALOG (was something else)
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Problems with recent MiNT beta versions
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] ext2fs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread