[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 14:50:12 +0200
In-reply-to: <19990601182943.E276@zowee.rz.uni-sb.de>; from Guido Flohr on Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 06:29:43PM +0200
References: <19990601182943.E276@zowee.rz.uni-sb.de>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 06:29:43PM +0200, Guido Flohr wrote:
> Anyway, I'm not very happy with distributing source files that I cannot
> test.  I'd rather exclude them.

Despite the problems, I would recommend to leave the stuff for the other
compilers in. Even if it is broken, it is a starting point if someone wants
to fix it - these things might easily get lost otherwise.

cu
Michael
-- 
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen

References:
- [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
  - From: "Guido Flohr" <gufl0000@stud.uni-sb.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] GlueSTiK and mem protection
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] New set_mmu and tools
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] MiNT and PureC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread