Re: [MiNT] is that expected from Secure Level?

["Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>]

> 
> yes, su crashes, or the bash right after. 
> Not the kernel etc, everythnig is fine..
> 
> pid 116 (bash): BAD SYSTEM|CALL: User
> PC=0|(basepage=1B85BA0,|text=1449220, data=1B85CA0,|bss=1B89C88) 
> That's my /tmp/alert.log
> You are right, crashng (nicely) or aborting :) still looked like a crash
> to me :)

That's the result of the SIGSYS signal sent by the kernel as a response 
to Super() or Supexec() made by su (or, strictly speaking, by the Mintlib
linked with it) at securelevel 2. It ought to be normal and exspected
behaviour.

It only makes me wonder WHICH bash gets killed: the one you're invoked the
su from (so you get logged out?) or perhaps some other instance of bash.

In other words: after the bash "crashes right after", do you get logged
out?

And, is the bash you're using a securelevel 2 compatible shell? (i.e. has
it lib pl > 46 linked?)

Gtx,

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
|mail: draco@atari.org                  |  Atari Falcon030 user   |
|http://www.obta.uw.edu.pl/~draco/      | Moderator gregis LATINE |
|http://draco.atari.org                 |       (loquentium)      |

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** U pospolstwa normalne jest, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.