[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] Unix future (was: Riebl Ethernet c
- To: Kristoffer Lawson <setok@fishpool.com>
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] Unix future (was: Riebl Ethernet c
- From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@discworld.dascon.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:55:33 +0200
- Cc: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990630213014.17114L-100000@gfanrend.fishpool.fi>; from Kristoffer Lawson on Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 09:31:54PM +0300
- References: <19990630011014.A299@tubul.dascon.de> <Pine.LNX.3.96.990630213014.17114L-100000@gfanrend.fishpool.fi>
- Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 09:31:54PM +0300, Kristoffer Lawson wrote:
> 2) On basic stuff SGI is known to be quite open with its security alerts
Right. However, there tend to be security holes in stuff that does not
produce such problems on other machines - there are other vendors which are
quite open, too, and part of that messages does not come from SGI.
> -> You can't base ideas of security on mailing list alerts.
Not completely, but you get an idea, especially when not only reading the
vendor-supplied security alerts.
cu
Michael
--
Michael Schwingen, Ahornstrasse 36, 52074 Aachen