[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Here is interesting.

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Here is interesting.
From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.demon.nl>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 18:27:16 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9907110716550.265-100000@tampa1-044.southeast.net>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, kellis wrote:

> PID 409 (wakegemd): assert(`proc->wait_q == que`)
> 	failed at line 466 of proc.c
> 	you must reboot the system.

Me and my colleagues at work are starting to wonder why there seem to be
so many assert commands left in "officially" released code..:) Isn't it
common practise to leave asserts only in debug/development versions?

Maurits.

+----------------------+-------------------+--------------+
| BassMent Productions | Proud sponsor of: |    * P M P * |
+----------------------+---------*------------------------+
| http://www.bassment.demon.nl   *   http://pmp.atari.org |
\________________________________*________________________/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Here is interesting.
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De>

References:
- [MiNT] Here is interesting.
  - From: kellis <kellis@leading.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] XaAES gone
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Here is interesting.
Previous by thread: [MiNT] Here is interesting.
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Here is interesting.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread