[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.52.3b

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Julian Reschke [SMTP:reschke@muenster.de]
> Sent:	Friday, August 06, 1999 1:27 PM
> To:	Jo-Even.Skarstein@gjensidige.no; mint@fishpool.com
> Subject:	RE: [MiNT] MiNTLib 0.52.3b
> > Normally yes. I don't see a problem in moving the mountpoints around, as
> > potential problems with programs that makes assumptions about names can
> > easily be circumvented with a symlink.
> As I said, I don't like it, because existing code might fail just because
> people forget the symlinks. And I haven't been convinced why it is a
> problem
> to keep them accessible in U: if you allow people to hide the entries.
Frank just said that a filesystem could only be mounted on one point, if
you're right and it can be mounted on / as well then obviously this is the
best solution.

> But then I would point out, that it *is* guaranteed that <driveletter>: is
> also available under u:\<driveletter>.
No. If this was the case then REN shouldn't work on u:\<driveletter>...

Jo Even Skarstein