[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
From: Thomas <thomashuth@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 11:57:31 +0200
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.05.9909191907290.871-100000@tos>; from Mario Becroft on Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 07:13:20PM +1200
References: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9909190236120.762-100000@tampa1-025.fdn.com> <Pine.MNT.4.05.9909191907290.871-100000@tos>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 07:13:20PM +1200, Mario Becroft wrote:
>I certainly don't see any sense in making further complexity by choosing a
>yet another name.

I think that Mario is right: mint/ seems also the best solution for me.
multitos/ might be still used for the AES, but it is not logical that MiNT
searches for XDDs and XFSs there. And introducing a complete new name like
mintboot/ would cause incompatibility with old programs like GEMSetup!

 Thomas H.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
  - From: Janez Valant <jvalant@capybara.m42.cx>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
  - From: kellis <kellis@leading.net>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
  - From: Mario Becroft <mb@tos.pl.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] boot folder name
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread