[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] boot folder name
- To: mint@fishpool.com
- Subject: Re: [MiNT] boot folder name
- From: tos4ever@ping.be (Martin "Nightowl" Byttebier)
- Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 22:48:04 +0200 (MET DST)
- In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9909182140260.126-100000@Hadesbox>
- References: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9909182030520.84-100000@rakastaja> <Pine.MNT.4.10.9909182140260.126-100000@Hadesbox>
- Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com
Hello Odd,
on Sat 18-09-1999 21:44 you wrote:
>On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:
>> I prefer "mint" personally.
>>
>> This leaves "multitos" free for MultiTOS ("setenv AESDIR c:\multitos"
>> could be defined in MINT.CNF if necessary, if AES 4/4.1 needs it).
>>
>
> I would prefer "mintboot". Because the only reason to change the current
>behaviour would be to make it easier for newcomers to understand/install
>MiNT. So, in that respect, "mintboot", IMO fits the purpose best, because
>it kinda explains itself. "Where does MiNT boot its driver/filesystems,
>configuration from?"... "Oh yeah, mintboot!" ;-)
As a common user I wonder why this must chance. Right now I've a good
working MiNT'98 setup. A few days ago I did an attempt (I didn't try very
hard though) to use 'mint' instead of 'multitos' but somewhere/somehow the
miNT'98 packet expects/needs multitos so I'm stuck for the moment.
CU
Martin
--
O-Tagger ß1.24: There's nothing a concentrated phaser blast can't solve.
***** Greetings from Okami Newsreader *****
** On the seventh day He created Atari **
********** tos4ever@ping.be ***********
** ICQ 37138054 **
But He uses a freeMiNT powered Hades 060 now
UTSI: http://www.ping.be/~ping1030/atari/prg-ind.htm
Atari FTP-site: ftp://chapelie.rma.ac.be/atari/