[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[MiNT] MiNT directory name

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
From: Mario Becroft <mb@tos.pl.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 09:11:13 +1200
>received: from localhost by tos.pl.net with smtp (Smail3.1.29.5 #1) id m11SRlI-0003CSC; Sun, 19 Sep 99 09:11 NZST
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9909181232360.91-100000@tampa1-025.fdn.com>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

What's wrong with simply "mint" like it has always been? This makes more
sense to me than any of the other alternatives, and it seems to be what
Sparemint is already using too. If you need to standardise on one name I
would remove multitos since this doesn't describe MiNT well at all.

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Mario Becroft                * Tariland, New Zealand Atari User Group |
| mb@tos.pl.net                * Atari Hardware Developments            |
| http://www.ak.planet.gen.nz/~mario/ * Atari Serial Mouse Interface    |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
  - From: kellis <kellis@leading.net>
- Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
  - From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Getting started with MiNT [Corrected url]
  - From: kellis <kellis@leading.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Memory protection and FreeMiNT 1.15.3
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] boot folder name
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] boot folder name
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] MiNT directory name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread