[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] minimal support base
On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 01:44:59 +0200, Martin-Eric Racine wrote:
MR>| PS: it would be nice if as many people as possible expressed
MR>| themselves on this issue, as it might determine a lot of
MR>| things on how future kernel development will procede.
MR>|
MR>| Mere users are particularly welcome to express themselves
MR>| on this issue, since they know better what hardware they
MR>| need MiNT to perform.
For my personal needs i would say that MiNT should be developed
for 68030, ...40, ...60, ...PPC? On my machine (a mere TT030) will
run an AES (N.AES as a matter of fact). A MiNT that does not
support the use of an AES is of little use to me. I will be forced
to switch to MagiC.
>From a more general perspective i think that it would be nice
if MiNT will remain usable on a 4 Mb 68000, probably without an
AES...
Godfried.
--
_/ _/_/ _/
============================================= _/ _/_/ _/ =======
G.N. Cobben _/ _/_/ _/
Erasmus College Zoetermeer _/ _/_/ _/
========================================= _/ _/_/ _/ ==========
eMail: _/ _/_/ _/
gncobben@luna.nl _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/
GCobben@erasmuscollege.nl _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/
Dinges is on:
http://www.luna.nl/~gncobben