RE: [MiNT] Security again

["Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>]

> From: owner-mint@fishpool.com [mailto:owner-mint@fishpool.com]On Behalf
> Of Frank Naumann
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 3:58 PM
> To: mint@fishpool.com
> Subject: Re: [MiNT] Security again
> ...
>
> Sorry, you give explicitly up any system control if applications can
> override system calls.

I think that some confusion is based on the fact that people don't agree
what the current behaviour is. My understanding is that you can change
BIOS/XBIOS/GEM or GEMDOS traps. How could N.AES install itself in the GEM
trap otherwise?