[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] Security again

To: <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: RE: [MiNT] Security again
From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@muenster.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:48:09 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.10.9912021341560.120-100000@milan>
Reply-to: <reschke@muenster.de>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

> From: owner-mint@fishpool.com [mailto:owner-mint@fishpool.com]On Behalf
> Of Frank Naumann
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 1:44 PM
> To: mint@fishpool.com
> Subject: RE: [MiNT] Security again
> ...
> The memory flags are for *compatibility* reasons. It's very bad to see
> that modern applications need such flags.

Might be true -- but this is "just" your opinion, not really documented this
way.

> Otherwise it's strongly not recommended to install TSRs *after* MiNT.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [MiNT] Security again
  - From: Martin-Eric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>

References:
- RE: [MiNT] Security again
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>

Prev by Date: RE: [MiNT] Security again
Next by Date: RE: [MiNT] Security again
Previous by thread: RE: [MiNT] Security again
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] Security again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread