[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [MiNT] Security again
Hi Jo!
> I'm not quite sure what you mean. Is there something that you can't
> implement as a XFS or XDD today? Remember, you can bend vectors as much as
> you like inside the kernel, so basically anything can be implemented as a
> XDD. TraPatch-like functionality would be nice in this case though (for
> efficiency), but it should only be available through the XDD/XFS-interface.
>
> [...]
>
> That's why I suggested that a common dispatcher for the GEM-trap would be a
> good thing. But this shouldn't be of any concern to MiNT, the correct place
> for this should IMO be in the VDI.
I completly agree with you.
Tschuess
...Frank
--
ATARI FALCON 040 // MILAN 040
--------------------------------------
Internet: fnaumann@cs.uni-magdeburg.de
Mausnet: Frank Naumann @ B2