[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] 2 GB != 2 GB

To: "George Crissman" <strads@tmisnet.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] 2 GB != 2 GB
From: Stefan Berndtsson <stefan@nocrew.org>
Date: 20 Mar 2000 21:18:57 +0100
Cc: <mint@fishpool.com>
In-reply-to: "George Crissman"'s message of "Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:15:24 -0800"
References: <200003202015.MAA18014@thunder.tmisnet.com>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald)

"George Crissman" <strads@tmisnet.com> writes:

> Ah, but 10 Megabytes of RAM (10.485E6) will not
> fit into 10 Megabytes of Disc (10.0E6).
> 
> That was why there was a problem.  We needed
> 11 Megabytes of disc to hold 10 Megabytes of RAM.

10 Megabytes of RAM fits perfectly fine into 10 Megabytes
of Disc.

10 Megabytes of RAM will not fit into a disk that a
company claims is 10 Megabytes.

There is a huge difference, that you refuse to see.

References:
- Re: [MiNT] 2 GB != 2 GB
  - From: "George Crissman" <strads@tmisnet.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] 2 GB != 2 GB
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] 2 GB != 2 GB
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] 2 GB != 2 GB
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] 2 GB != 2 GB
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread