RE: [MiNT] Proposal for SLB extension

["Julian Reschke" <reschke@medicaldataservice.de>]

JW>The backdraw of your proposal is that you have to check wheter the
basepage
JW>pointer is needed at run time. So your code has to deal with both
JW>possibilities.

Not true. He could just simply supply two different function call handlers.

JW>And saying "Sorry, your version of lib foo requires a pointer to the
basepage
JW>on every call. This is not supported." is no good solution.

Which was not proposed.

JW>And if there are two different implementation of the same lib you will
run
JW>into trouble.

Why would this be a problem. The behaviour is encoded in the header of the
library. That's it.