[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues

To: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>, "Petr Stehlik" <joy@sophics.cz>
Subject: RE: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues
From: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 14:43:43 +0100
Cc: <mint@fishpool.com>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101121449590.41898-100000@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

> From: owner-mint@fishpool.com [mailto:owner-mint@fishpool.com]On Behalf
> Of Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:51 PM
> To: Petr Stehlik
> Cc: mint@fishpool.com
> Subject: Re: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues
> 
> 
> > I would say that the /dev/mouse was simply never used. It was just
> > implemented but since it uses Sun protocol I am afraid nobody uses it
> > really. At least the natural users (AES, vconsd and gpm) don't use it
> > today (AFAIK). 
> 
> What about the X11R5 server?

And besides, what's so bad about the Sun protocol?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues
  - From: Petr Stehlik <joy@sophics.cz>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues
  - From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Empty mail from `foo@shadowbbs.cx'
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues
Next by thread: RE: [MiNT] XaAES / GEM memory issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread