[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Why not O3

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
From: François LE COAT <lecoat@ief.u-psud.fr>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2001 12:01:10 +0200
Organization: LaMI Université d'Evry
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104031406060.12335-100000@antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl> <3AC9C531.2070701@ief.u-psud.fr> <jevgomnfq6.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
Reply-to: flecoat@lami.univ-evry.fr
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01

Hi,

Andreas Schwab wrote:

François LE COAT <lecoat@ief.u-psud.fr> writes:

|> "-O2" is the default optimization level of GCC

The default is -O0.


Yes, sorry, I meant -O is equivalent to -O2.
Am I wrong ?

Dr. François LE COAT
Author of Eureka 2.12 (2D Graph Describer, 3D Modeller)
http://eureka.atari.org
mailto:lecoat@atari.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: Thomas Binder <gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: François LE COAT <lecoat@ief.u-psud.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread