[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Why not O3

To: MiNT mailing list <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
From: "Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz" <draco@obta.uw.edu.pl>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:19:48 +0200 (CEST)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0103302008230.24104-100000@pzs.karolex.com.pl>
Sender: owner-mint@fishpool.com

Die 30.03.01 (20:09) owner-mint@fishpool.com scripsit:

> Question: why Mint kernel is compiled with O2 and not 03? 

Because -O3 is the same as -O2 -funroll-loops, IIRC, which produces larger
binaries not gaining any significant speedup.

V.

--
Konrad M.Kokoszkiewicz
mail: draco@atari.org
http://draco.atari.org

** Ea natura multitudinis est,
** aut servit humiliter, aut superbe dominatur (Liv. XXIV,25)
*************************************************************
** Taka to juz natura pospolstwa, ze albo sluzy ono unizenie,
** albo bezczelnie sie panoszy.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: François LE COAT <lecoat@ief.u-psud.fr>
- Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
  - From: Thomas Binder <gryf@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] gcc and -o *.prg or *.app
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] gcc and -o *.prg or *.app
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Why not O3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread