[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Future (was Re: MiNT 1.16)



On Po, 2002-11-04 at 11:59, Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz wrote:
> > So my $0.02 is, let's go on with our new generation MiNT (MiNT is New
> > Technology) ;) in a new major version number, and leave the possibility
> > for further development of the 1.x version, which would mainly be bugfixes
> > and the occasional backport of new functionality that does not require
> > threads, virtual memory, control over traps or a 030 processor. (If any).
> > :)
> 
> As I understand, this is why there is 1.15.12 at one time with 1.16 :-)

Does it mean that 1.16 does not run on 68000?

And BTW, 1.16 is not a major version number change.

Petr