[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] compile time options
on 11/30/02 11:24 AM, Konrad M. Kokoszkiewicz at draco@obta.uw.edu.pl wrote:
>>>> Sorry, that doesn't help at all to find the differnce against the
>>>> original TOSFS.
>>>
>>> Sure, but at least some thoughts on it can be done. Perhaps it is
>>> completely wrong, but for me it may mean a difference in
>>> Fsfirst()/Fsnext(). The compiler is given filename TEST.GFA, but doesn't
>>> find it (how a TOS program can find a filename, if not with
>>> Fsfirst()/Fsnext() or just Fopen()?), and then appends .GFA extender to
>>> try again.
>>
>> It's just that Fsfirst/Fsnext have nothing todo with NEWFATFS or OLDTOSFS.
>> Fsfirst/Fsnext is emulated by the kernel independant from the filesystem
>> drivers.
>
> So perhaps there's something wrong with this emulation. I'll try doing
> some test when I am back home. And perhaps Lonny could explain/trace, what
> the GFA compiler does with the passed filename?
I would surely help if I am able.
Where the problem actually is I am not sure, only that booting to single
TOS solves the problem. I'd like to avoid having to reboot to compile
as I love using MiNT and GFA. The funny part is the GFA Editor was
always the problem, but now I can code in the old GFA Editor for hours
under MiNT, even with aIRC running in the background, but cannot compile.
;o)
In a previous reply you stated: "Options are in sys/KERNELDEFS."
I see no reference to newfatfs in this file or how to adjust the
file in such a way to let me control which drives are seen as
newfatfs drives. If I can control which drives are seen as newfatfs
I simply will not enable the one drive where all my sources are stored.
I know the GFA compiler is very old, this is one way to get around it for
the time being. Can I get some help here? I am lost how to do this.
------------------------------------------
Lonny Pursell http://www.q1.net/~atari/