[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] MintList proposal

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] MintList proposal
From: Michael Schwingen <rincewind@a-tuin.dascon.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 14:03:37 +0100
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
Importance: High
In-reply-to: <20021217135652.A13523@pc272.hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: rincewind@a-tuin.dascon.de, mint@fishpool.com
References: <20021217115239.A700B18883@core.preferuje.luzik.pl> <je3cow3k99.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20021217135652.A13523@pc272.hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 01:56:52PM +0100, Thomas Binder wrote:
> Not to mention that modern mailers like mutt have a "list reply"
> function as well as support for the (non-standard)
> Mail-Followup-To header.

Full Ack.

Another disadvantage of setting the Reply-To: to the list is that all
auto-replys ("I am out of the office...", as well as "xyscan detected a
virus in your mail from ...") will be sent to the whole list instead of the
author.

Yes, I know these are bad, but at my company address, policy dictates that I
use this auto-reply function, and I guess I am not alone with this.

cu
Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] MintList proposal
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>

Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] MintList proposal
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] MintList proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread