[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] nfs

To: mint@fishpool.com ([MiNT] Mailing-List)
Subject: Re: [MiNT] nfs
From: joska@nvg.org (Jo Even Skarstein)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 07:26:02 +0200
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.60.0406272141270.21007@wh58-508.st.uni-magdeburg.de>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 21:42:04 +0200 (CEST), Frank Naumann wrote:

> > I am running MiNT always with memory protection disabled. And everything is
> > stable. BTW I would like to know how many people runs MiNT with and without
> > memory protection.
>
> Never without for sure :-)

Then I'm *really* interested in how you manage to run inetd and portmap.
Both of these crash at bootup and halts MiNT if memory protection is
enabled. I'm using the binaries from the Sparemint rpm's.

/*
** Jo Even Skarstein    http://home.nvg.org/~joska/
*/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [MiNT] nfs
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>

References:
- Re: [MiNT] nfs
  - From: Frank Naumann <fnaumann@mail.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] nfs
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] nfs
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] nfs
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] nfs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread