[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Coreutils

To: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Coreutils
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 00:24:37 +0200
Cc: Mint List <mint@fishpool.com>
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <1091734488.9471.32.camel@localhost> (Mark Duckworth's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:34:48 -0400")
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1091734488.9471.32.camel@localhost>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com> writes:

> -: test skip-seek-3: mismatch, comparing skip-seek-3.5 (actual) and
> skip-seek-3.2 (expected)
> *** skip-seek-3.5       Thu Aug  5 15:12:16 2004
> --- skip-seek-3.2       Thu Aug  5 15:12:16 2004
> ***************
> *** 1 ****
> ! zyxwv56789
> \ No newline at end of file
> --- 1 ----
> ! zyxwv
> \ No newline at end of file

It appears as if write() after ftruncate() is ignored.  I think this is
the only test using ftruncate.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

References:
- [MiNT] Coreutils
  - From: Mark Duckworth <mduckworth@atari-source.com>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] Coreutils
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] xaaes: benchmarktest old vs new ?
Previous by thread: [MiNT] Coreutils
Next by thread: [MiNT] ftruncate (was: Re: Coreutils)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread