[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)
From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:35:55 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-to: mint@fishpool.com
Delivered-to: mint@lists.fishpool.fi
In-reply-to: <Pine.MNT.4.31.0408040809310.262-100000@hadesbox>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Odd Skancke wrote:

>  A wordprocessor/text editor that _takes_this_design_flaw_ into account is
> a _proper_tool_!! Ok? So a program that takes this this into account shows
> that Maurits is right, it _works_around_ a _design_flaw_. A program that
> does _not_ take this into account is not a _proper_tool_, and Konrad is
> right. Goddamned...

Yes this is the kind of mess one gets when pulling quotes out of context
just for the sake of disagreeing.

And though (or because) I'm an atheist, swearing never impressed me.

Maurits.

References:
- Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)
  - From: Odd Skancke <ozk@atari.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: My remarks (2)
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] My remarks (2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread