[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MiNT] usage of wind_calc()
Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
Hi,
I'm not at all an expert in (Xa)AES system calls, like the guys posting
messages in this thread. Most of the technical stuff in this discussion
I don't understand.
But I want to add my opinion from a user's point of view.
My first experience with a multitasking AES for MiNT was the one that
was distributed with Atari MultiTOS when I bought my Falcon030. This
MiNT/AES was so buggy and unstable that I removed it from my harddisk
very soon.
Some time after that I bought and installed N.AES. This was a big
improvement. Much more stable, and really usable.
XaAES started to become a serious and free alternative for N.AES thanks
to the work of Henk Robbers. He removed a lot of bugs and added features
that made XaAES usable with cleanly programmed older as well as new Gem
apps, and even with many older apps that were NOT programmed very cleanly.
Then XaAES was ported to gcc and moved to the SpareMiNT CVS where it was
picked up by some of the guys discussing in this thread.
The current situation is that XaAES has improved greatly in terms of
stability, speed, and features. In that order.
What's the point I want to make? I really like the way XaAES is the way
it is. I want an XaAES that is light, stable, and fast. If you want to
add new features - like theme support and even the possibility to change
themes on the fly - go ahead. I don't want to spoil your fun. But please
please be careful. Don't introduce (too many) new bugs, keep things
compatible with older apps that work fine now, and don't create an
oversized XaAES that will use too much processor time and memory on
original Atari machines. (Same story for the FreeMiNT kernel, but that
is not what this thread is about).
Very nice and wise words.
It is my recommendation to #if anything that goes beyond N.AES
functionality.
XaAES will come in 2 flavours:
1: N.AES compatible. A version that will not grow further. (XaAES)
2: A version that may grow and become as powerfull as the developers
are willing to make it. (X.AES)
No developers fun will be spoiled.
People with older hardware can keep using a very good, fast and fully
maintained AES
Needless to say that the 2 flavours are produced from the same
source tree. Both fully subject to bugfixing and improvements.
--
Groeten; Regards.
Henk Robbers. mailto:h.robbers@chello.nl
http://members.ams.chello.nl/h.robbers/Home.html
Interactive disassembler: TT-Digger; http://digger.atari.org
A Home Cooked teXt editor: AHCX