[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost

To: mint@fishpool.com
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:38:51 +0200
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1121726200.17671.32.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Revee Creative Productions
References: <F6E60FAE8239614A97E6B60FDCB29A8F46D9DF@i2km86-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net> <200507182004.01294.maurits@bassment.nu> <1121726200.17671.32.camel@taro.coolrunningconcepts.com>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

> Which method should the next kick-ass application be distributed?  An
> RPM with files all over the place, or as a .PRG and .RSC you can put
> whereever you want?

You're just totally clueless aren't you. All this has nothing to do with using 
RPM or not. So maybe Papyrus doesn't need an installer but several apps do, 
and this is not _because_ they have an installer available, but it is _why_ 
they have an installer available. You seem to think using rpm forces packages 
to become complicated, which of course is nonsense.

Maurits.

References:
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: <jan.thomas@bt.com>
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Maurits van de Kamp <maurits@bassment.nu>
- Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
  - From: Evan Langlois <Evan@CoolRunningConcepts.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Next by thread: Re: [MiNT] Re[2]: GEM boost
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread