[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components

To: MiNT List <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
From: Henk Robbers <h.robbers@chello.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:58:21 +0200
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <op.sufpodae8yw5lr@lon92-6-82-236-205-36.fbx.proxad.net>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
References: <op.sufpodae8yw5lr@lon92-6-82-236-205-36.fbx.proxad.net>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)

Arnaud BERCEGEAY wrote:

Hello,
I don't doubt it is a nice feature of Windom, but Windom ain't theonly possible route to
take when creating applications.
100% Agree :) but if you are a C coder, then windom may help, that'sall. No requirement at all.


I dont use WINDOM.
I developed my own system over the years.
Creating a new GEM app for me has become already very easy.

--
Groeten; Regards.
Henk Robbers.    mailto:h.robbers@chello.nl
                   http://members.ams.chello.nl/h.robbers/Home.html
Interactive disassembler:     TT-Digger;  http://digger.atari.org
A Home Cooked teXt editor:    AHCX

References:
- Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
  - From: "Arnaud BERCEGEAY" <arnaud.bercegeay@free.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by thread: [MiNT] FW: WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread