[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MiNT] FW: WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components

To: "[MiNT] Mailing-List" <mint@fishpool.com>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] FW: WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
From: Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:14:51 -0400
Delivered-to: fnaumann@mail.boerde.de
In-reply-to: <1122109208.42e20718e8454@webmail2.utbm.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0

on 7/23/2005 5:00 AM, olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr wrote:

> It's your point of view of Mint user.

Nope.  Sorry, it's my view as an Atari user.
I have the developers kit from Atari (which I bought from Atari) that shows
the documented calls that magic deviates from and/or does not even support.
I don't care how much you love magic, it falls short on the specs.
End of story.

-- 
Lonny Pursell    http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/

References:
- Re: [MiNT] FW: WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
  - From: "olivier.landemarre@utbm.fr" <Olivier.Landemarre@utbm.fr>

Prev by Date: [MiNT] XaAES
Next by Date: Re: [MiNT] FW: WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Previous by thread: Re: [MiNT] FW: WCOWORK vs WINDOM for components
Next by thread: [MiNT] Minor mystery solved
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread