Re: [MiNT] GEM edit field question

[Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net>]

on 7/30/2005 4:31 PM, evan@coolrunningconcepts.com wrote:

> Quoting Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>:
> 
>> Lonny Pursell <atari@bright.net> writes:
>> 
>>> Is it just a bad design from 1985 when the assumption was the '@' char would
>>> probably not be used?  Anyone know?  Documented somewhere?
> 
> OK - I don't understand the problem.   How does using the @ sign the
> source code
> affect the GEM edit field?   Surely you can type an @ into a GEM edit
> field!  I
> don't remember that ever being a problem in the past.   If this is the
> case, we
> should change it.

Suggesting to change it is jumping the gun.
All I want is info, nothing more and apparently you have not used a GEM app
for 12 years.  ;-P

-- 
Lonny Pursell    http://www.bright.net/~gfabasic/